Designing a narrative layer for archival content that allows users to curate archival materials into contextual stories while preserving the integrity and trust of the archive.

Users can locate content on archive.org, but once found, content often lacks context explaining why it matters, narrative structure that supports learning, and a way to share interpretations within the platform. Core user pain: 'I can find primary sources, but I still need to leave the Archive to explain them to others.' This gap forces users to rely on external tools, fragmenting workflows and limiting engagement within the archive itself. Key constraints: Archival content cannot be altered, trust and credibility must be preserved, the solution must scale to millions of items, and the UI must align with archive.org's existing design system.
Explored how a narrative-driven feature, called Featured Articles, could allow users to curate archival materials into contextual stories. Conducted 8 semi-structured user interviews with researchers, librarians, and frequent Archive users. Performed archive usage analysis, task-flow walkthroughs of current archive.org experience, and competitive review of annotation and narrative tools. Key insights revealed: (1) Search ≠ Understanding—users could find content but struggled to interpret it without external context, (2) Context Lives Outside the Archive—researchers exported links into external documents, and (3) Users Want Guidance, Not Just More Content—participants preferred curated paths over infinite exploration. Reframed the problem: How might we allow users to create and share contextual narratives using archival content—without compromising archival integrity or trust?

Complete app structure showing navigation hierarchy, features, and user flows from onboarding to daily interactions

Detailed site map showing the hierarchical structure of the Internet Archive app

Example of a collection page within the Internet Archive app, showcasing the user interface and content organization
Delivered a validated concept for narrative-driven archival engagement that preserves archival integrity while enabling community-driven storytelling. The Featured Articles feature allows users to: select items from Archive collections, arrange them into a logical sequence, and add introductions, transitions, and explanations. User testing showed participants understood the narrative format immediately, spent longer engaging with curated content, and valued keeping interpretation within the Archive. Stakeholder feedback from Internet Archive designers supported the non-invasive architecture, and academic stakeholders saw strong educational value. The project provides a strong foundation for balancing usability, credibility, and storytelling while demonstrating senior-level ability to translate abstract research into scalable systems and design under real-world constraints.
Conducted 8 semi-structured user interviews with researchers and librarians who contextualize archival materials, frequent Internet Archive users, and graduate students working with primary sources. Performed archive usage and demographic analysis to understand current user behaviors. Created task-flow walkthroughs of current archive.org experience to identify friction points. Completed competitive review of annotation and narrative tools to understand existing solutions. Research revealed three critical insights: users could find content but struggled to interpret it, researchers exported links to external tools (Archive loses engagement at interpretation stage), and users preferred curated paths over infinite exploration (narrative structure matters more than volume).
Made two critical design decisions with intentional tradeoffs: (1) Linear Narrative Over Free Annotation—explored inline annotations but found they overwhelmed users. Chose less flexibility for more clarity and readability. (2) Editorial Structure vs. Social Feed—Featured Articles follow an editorial format rather than social posting. Chose slower creation process for higher trust and quality. Information architecture: Featured Articles exist as a new content type integrated into existing Archive navigation with multiple entry points. Clear labeling and consistent UI patterns minimize learning curves and reduce discoverability friction.
Built and tested prototypes focusing on: narrative readability, discoverability of Featured Articles, and user understanding of content vs. commentary distinction. Key findings: users understood the narrative format immediately without explanation, participants spent significantly longer engaging with curated content compared to standard search results, and researchers strongly valued keeping interpretation within the Archive ecosystem. Stakeholder feedback: Internet Archive designers supported the non-invasive architecture that preserves original content, academic stakeholders identified strong educational value, and feedback emphasized the importance of governance and moderation needs for future implementation.
Access without context limits impact—discovery alone doesn't guarantee understanding
Constraints often sharpen better design decisions—archival integrity requirements led to clearer separation of content and commentary
Trust is a UX problem, not just a content problem—visual distinction and labeling are essential
Linear narratives provide more clarity than free-form annotations for most users
Users prefer curated paths over infinite exploration when learning
Editorial structure builds trust more effectively than social feed formats
Context that lives outside the platform fragments workflows and reduces engagement
Scalability must be considered from day one when designing for archival systems
Multiple entry points reduce discoverability friction in complex information systems
Moderation and governance are critical for community-contributed content
Senior-level insight: Translating abstract research into scalable systems requires balancing usability, credibility, and storytelling
I'm always interested in new experiments, research collaborations, and pushing the boundaries of AI design.
Bringing the spark back to relationships
Designing ethical AI to combat fast fashion greenwashing
Making climate change personal through AR visualization